Carbon dioxide is produced through the respiration of animals and plants, which consume oxygen and release carbon dioxide. When biomass is subjected to decomposition or combustion, the carbon fixed in living matter is also released into the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide. The non-metal and oxygen gas (O 2) are the reactants in this type of reaction, and a non-metal oxide is the product. The reactions of carbon and sulfur with oxygen are examples of non-metals reacting with oxygen. Carbon and sulfur both form dioxides with oxygen, but this is not true of all non-metals.
Carbon and oxygen are similar in a few ways. They are both elements, which are the fundamental building blocks of all matter. This means that they both have protons and electrons. They also both have neutrons. Because they are elements, they are both on the periodic table; carbon is number 6 on the periodic table and oxygen is number 8 on the periodic table.
Their weight, number of atoms and density depend on a lot of things. I am going to use the word 'mass' to describe their weight even though these are different things. Weight can change depending on gravity. Mass just describes how much of 'something' we have. So our 'something' weighs more on Jupiter than on Earth, but the mass is the same.
I should also introduce 'atomic weight', which is how many grams are in a mole of atoms. Atoms are really, really small. A single atom is over 100,000 times smaller than the thickness of a single strand of hair! That also means a single atom is not very heavy, and so we'd have to have a lot of atoms to give us 1 lb of carbon or oxygen. That's why we use the mole.
The mole is just a number that represents 6.02x1023 (or 602 sextillion or 602,000,000,000,000,000,000,000). You could have a mole of tacos (if you had a mole of tacos, you could feed every person on Earth 1000 tacos per day for 23 million years); a mole of dollars (this would take 19 million years to spend even if you spent 1 billion dollars per second); or a mole of atoms. Carbon and oxygen have different atomic weights: 12 grams per mole for carbon and 16 grams per mole for oxygen.
So to answer the first part of your second question, the atomic mass of carbon and oxygen are different. This means that if you weighed 1 mole of carbon and 1 mole of oxygen, oxygen would have a higher weight. However, a pound of oxygen would have the same weight as a pound of carbon. The second part of your second question (the number of atoms in carbon and oxygen) depends on how much carbon and oxygen you have. As mentioned, if you had a mole of carbon and a mole of oxygen, you'd have the same number of atoms (1 mole). However, if you had 14 grams of carbon and 14 grams of oxygen, you'd have more than 1 mole of carbon and less than 1 mole of oxygen! So they would have a different number of atoms.
So to answer the first part of your second question, the atomic mass of carbon and oxygen are different. This means that if you weighed 1 mole of carbon and 1 mole of oxygen, oxygen would have a higher weight. However, a pound of oxygen would have the same weight as a pound of carbon. The second part of your second question (the number of atoms in carbon and oxygen) depends on how much carbon and oxygen you have. As mentioned, if you had a mole of carbon and a mole of oxygen, you'd have the same number of atoms (1 mole). However, if you had 10 grams of carbon and 10 grams of oxygen, you'd have more than 1 mole of carbon and less than 1 mole of oxygen! So they would have a different number of atoms.
The third part of your question is tricky. As it turns out, carbon and oxygen exist in many different forms. The oxygen that you breathe in is actually two oxygen atoms bonded together. Carbon commonly bonds with itself to form graphite or diamond. The density of gaseous oxygen is 1.429 g/L. The density of graphite is 2160 g/L. And the density of diamond is a whopping 3515 g/L. But this isn't really a fair comparison, since graphite and diamond are both solids, which are typically really dense compared to gasses. So if you make oxygen really cold (-218.79 oC or -361.82 oF, which is way colder than -89.2 oC or -128.6 oF measured in Antarctica), you can make solid oxygen. Solid oxygen's density is about 1500 g/L – still smaller than graphite or diamond.
Carbon Oxides
Carbon forms two important gases with oxygen: carbon monoxide, CO, and carbon dioxide, CO2. Carbon oxides are important components of the atmosphere, and they are parts of the carbon cycle.
Carbon dioxide is naturally produced by respiration and metabolism, and consumed by plants in their photosynthesis. Since the industrial revolution, greater amount of carbon dioxide has been generated for over a hundred years due to increased industrial activities.
Today, information on carbon oxides is important. Issues related to carbon oxides have no boundaries. The Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CADIAC) provides global datasets on carbon dioxide and other atmosphere gases and climate. These datasets are available to international researchers, policymakers, managers, and educators to help evaluate complex environmental issues associated with potential climate change.
Carbon monoxide is also a national and global concern. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) considers CO a senseless killer, and it provides information on CO poisoning and detection.
What are the molecular structures of carbon oxides?
The formation of carbon oxides is due to electronic configurations of carbon and oxygen. They have 4 and 6 valence electrons respectively. Using these valence electrons, we can give the Lewis dot structure for CO and three resonance structures for CO2 as follows:
These formulas suggest very strong bonding between carbon and oxygen in these gaseous molecules: triple bond in CºO, and double bonds in O=C=O. However, a formula containing a triple bond contribute to the resonance structure.
What atomic orbitals are involved in the molecular orbitals of carbon oxides?
The chemical bonding is more of an interpretation of the molecules in view of their properties. Using results from quantum mechanical approach, we may start by reviewing the electronic configurations of carbon and oxygen:
C: 1s2 2s22p2
O: 1s2 2s22p4
Thus, the carbon has 4 valence electrons and oxygen has 6 valence electrons. The s and p atomic orbitals are available for chemical bonding.
The valence bond approach suggests that p orbitals of carbon and oxygen are used in these molecules. In CO, only one such atomic orbital from each atom of C and O are employed to form a sigma, s, bond, and overlapping of two p orbitals leads to the formation of the two pi, p, bond. Thus, the bond order is 3 between C and O in CºO.
Note
A (CO) molecule has the same number of electrons as (N_2), and these molecules are said to be iso-electronic. The N2 molecule is also represented by NºN.
The molecular orbital (MO) approach for CO is describe in the lecture, and the MO energy level diagram has been given there. The plots of contours of equal electron densities has also been shown in earlier lectures, and the diagram for CO molecular orbitals is shown below:
The valence bond approach for CO2 bonding is also very interesting. The two sp hybrid orbitals of central carbon overlaps with one p orbital from each of the oxygen atoms to from the two C-O s bonds in O-C-O. The two remaining p orbitals of carbon overlap with a p orbital each of the two oxygen atoms forming two p bonds, leading to the formation of O=C=O.
Here is a challenge: find a suitable diagram for either valence bond approach or for the MO approach for carbon dioxide in the web.
Why do CO molecules form strong bonds with metal atoms in carbonyls?
Molecules of (CO) and (NN) have two (pi) bonds. Super smash bros min min stage. Since the two atoms in (CO) are different, this made (CO) much more reactive than nitrogen. Indeed, (CO) forms many carbonyls with metal atoms or ions. For example, you have encountered some of the following carbonyls on the page of Heterogeneous catalysts
- Ni(CO)4
- Fe(CO)5
- Co2(u-CO)2(CO)6, (u-CO meaning CO bridged between two metal atoms)
- Mn2(CO)10
- Fe3(CO)12
- Co4(CO)12
- Rh4(CO)12
- CFe5(CO)15
- Rh6(CO)16
- Os6(CO)18
Pycharm community download. The study of metal carbonyls started with the discover of ferrocene Fe(C5H5)2 and now hundreds if not thousands of metal carbonyls have been synthesized.
A sbond is formed between the carbon of CO and the metal atom. Such a bonding is very sensible if we consider the sp hybrid atomic orbitals of carbon being used in this case. Since there are two electrons in this orbitals of CO, the metal atom gains at least some fraction of electron due to the formation of this bond.
The empty antibonding (pi) orbital (pi^*) of (CO) has the right symmetry and orientation to receive the back-donated electron from the filled d-orbitals of the metal atom. The back donation reinforce the sigma bond, and vice versa. This type of bonding has been called the synergic bonding mechanism by Cotton and Wilkinson in their Advanced Inorganic Chemistry. A diagram showing this type of bonding scheme is shown on page 159 in Inorganic Chemistry by Swaddle.
What are some of the applications of carbon oxides?
Carbon oxides are useful commodities. A gas containing CO and hydrogen is called synthetic gas, because it can be converted to methanol using a catalyst. During the past few decades, many metal carbonyls have been prepared. These carbonyls are potential catalysts. When the metal carbonyl is a gas, the purified metal carbonyl gas can be used for the production of extra-pure metals.
Carbon dioxide is also a useful industrial gas. It is widely used in food and beverage industry. Here are some of its applications.
- making efferescent drinks
- manufacture of urea, CO(NH2)2, as fertilizer
- promote plant growth in green house
- making dry ice
- fire extinguisher
- provide an inert atmosphere for fruit and vegetable preservation
- as a supercritical fluid for solvent extraction
The critical temperature of carbon dioxide is only 304 K at a critical pressure of 7.39 MPa (almost 7 atm). These conditions can easily be met to generate supercritical carbon dioxide, which is a powerful and descriminating solvent. The supercritical fluid penetrates porous solids, evaporates without leaving a trace. Thus, this fluid is widely used as an extracting solvent. This fluid is also very useful in the field of analytical chemsitry.
On the high technology side, carbon dioxide lasers can provide a continuous laser beam from several milliwatts to several killowatts with a typical efficiency of 30%, one of the most efficient laser generation devices. This link also illustrates the basic theory of laser. Among many applications of laser, carbon dioxide laser has been used for skin resurfacing as an art of cosmetic surgery.
On the other hand, the heavier carbon dioxide usually stay in lower grounds, and when its concentration is very high, it can be a thread to living beings who will die of asphyxiation.
How has carbon dioxide level changed?
When Henry Ford put people to work on the assembly line, he did not worry about the consequence of automobile exhaust. He probably did not foresee the change of the society. Now everyone wants a piece of the carbondioxide generating machine. You can imagine that when all countries use as much energy as Canadians do, the carbon dioxide level of the atmosphere will be much higher. We need good measurements about carbon dioxide level in order to know how it is changing.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the U.S. is keeping track of it, and the measurements at Barrow, Alaska. The annual increase has been reported to be 1.49 ppm by volume per year. On the other hand, the atmospheric CO2 concentration was about 280 ppm by volume in the 1700s before the industrial revolution, and it was 360 ppm in 1994. If you want more details about Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the U.S., this link is full of data.
Engineers, scientists, politician and the general public believe that increase level of CO2 will cause the world to warm up, because some scientists have demonstrated their findings and the experts agreed. Lengthy discussion is required to present scientific evidences for the so called green house effect of CO2, and hopefully some day you will be able to judge the argument yourself. I have not found simple and convincing evidence to present at this time. However, experts have suggested a correlation with the increase level of CO2 and the average temperature of the globe.
What measure can be taken to reduce CO2 emission?
The green house effect of (CO_2) has attracted attention not only of expert and politicians, the public pressure (mostly the news media) have made the reduction of (CO_2) emission an international priority. The United Nations Panel on Climate Change made several recommendations regarding (CO_2).
- use natural gas as fuel rather than coal or oil
- use solar or nuclear energy instead of fossil fuels for electricity generation
- reduce rate of deforestation
- limit use of automobiles
Well, what can be done at a personal level, as a community, and as a country requires the determination of individuals. This is a challenge for us all especially engineers, because they are at the forefront of many industries. We face many front for a solution to the problem of carbon dioxide emission.
Example 1
The standard enthalpy of formation of NO is 90.25 kJ / mol and the standard entropies of (N_2), (O_2), (NO) are 191.61, 205.138 and 210.761 J (K mol)-1 respectively. Calculate the Gibb's energy for the reaction
[ce{N_2 + O_2 rightarrow 2 NO}nonumber ]
at standard conditions.
Solution
The entropy of formation for the above reaction is
Code 2 for mac. [begin{align*} Delta S^o &= 2 times 210.761 - (205.138 + 191.61) [4pt] &= 24.77 frac{J}{K mol} end{align*}]
The Gibb's energy of formation is then:
Carbon And Oxygen Ionic Or Covalent
[ begin{align*} Delta G^o &= Delta H^o - TDelta S^o [4pt] &= 180.5 - 298*0.02477 [4pt] & = 180.5 - 7.38 ,kJ [4pt] &= 173.12, kJ end{align*}]
This value shows that the reaction is endothermic.
DISCUSSION
Carbon And Oxygen Bond Type
What is the equilibrium constant for the reaction as written and what is the implication of the result in the discussion of NO in air?